mercoledì 20 maggio 2009

ONU: Risoluzioni di condanna a Israele: 10) Ris. n° 248 del 24 marzo 1968.

Homepage
Vers. 1.0/20.5.09
Precedente - Successiva
Risoluzioni: 93/1951 - 101/1953 - 106/1955 - 111/1956 - 127/1958 - 162/1961 - 171/1962 - 228/1966 - 237/1967 - 248/1968 - 250/1968 - 251/1968 - 252/1968 - 256/1968 - 259/1968 - 262/1968 - 265/1969 - 267/1969 - 270/1969 - 271/1969 - 279/1969 - 280/1969 - 285/1970 - 298/1971 - 313/1972 - 316/1972 - 317/1972 - 332/1973 - 337/1973 - 347/1974 - 425/1978 - 427/1979 - 444/1979 - 450/1979 - 452/1979 - 465/1980 - 467/1980 - 468/1980 - 469/1980 - 471/1980 - 476/1980 - 478/1980 - 484/1980 - 487/1981 - 497/1981 - 498/1981 - 501/1982 - 509/1982 - 515/1982 - 517/1982 - 518/1982 - 520/1982 - 573/1985 - 587/1986 - 592/1986 - 605/1987 - 607/1988 - 608/1988 - 636/1989 - 641/1989 - 672/1990 - 673/1990 - 681/1990 - 694/1991 - 726/1992 - 799/1992 - 904/1994 - 1402/2002 - 1403/2002 - 1405/2002 - 1435/2002 -



10.
RISOLUZIONE n. 248
del 24 marzo 1968
Fonte


THE SITUATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST20

Resolution 248 (1968)
of 24 March 1968

The Security Council,

Having heard the statements of the representatives of Jordan and Israel,

Having noted the contents of the letters of the Permanent Representatives of Jordan and Israel in documents S/8470,22 S/8475,22 S/8478,22 S/8483,22 S/8484,22 and S/8486,22

Having noted further the supplementary information provided by the Chief of Staff of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization as contained in documents S/7930/Add. 64 and Add. 65,22

Recalling resolution 236 (1967) by which the Securit y Council condemned any and all violations of the cease-fire,

Observing that the military action by the armed forces of Israel on the territory of Jordan was of a large-scale and carefully planned nature.

Considering that all violent incidents and other violations of the cease-fire should be prevented and not overlooking past incidents of this nature,

Recalling further resolution 237 (1967) wich called upon the Government of Israel to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants of the areas where military operations have taken place,

1. Deplores the loss of life and heavy damage to property;

2. Condemns the military action launched by Israel in flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and the cease-fire resolutions;

3. Deplores all violent incidents in violation of the cease-fire and declares that such actions of military reprisal and other grave violations of the cease-fire cannot be tolerated and that the Security Council would have to consider further and more effective steps as envisaged in the Charter to ensure against repetition of such acts;

4. Call upon Israel to desist from acts or activities in contravention of resolution 237 (1967);

5. Requests the Secretary-General to keep the situa¬tion under review and to report to the Security Council as appropriate.

Adopted unanimously at the 1407th meeting.

NOTE

(20) Resolutions or decisions on this question were also adopted in 1967.

(22) See Official Records of the Security Council, Twenty-third Year, Supplement for January, February and March 1968.

2 commenti:

Anonimo ha detto...

http://corrieredelveneto.corriere.it/veneto/dilatua/cronache/articoli/2009/05/21/professore_nagazionista_genitori_full.shtml

le tribbu ebraiche sono gia in eccitazione...!!!!

Antonio Caracciolo ha detto...

Ho mandato un lungo commento al giornale. Me la prendo con il lettore idiota che ha scritto un commento "Se questo è un docente”. Tutti questi idioti, in buona o cattiva fede pieni di pregiudizi, ritengono che sia verità la segatura che hanno in testa. Nessun dubbio, nessun confronto, nessuna discussione critica, nessuna verifica per loro è ammessa di fronte a ciò che pretendono di imporre come una Verità Assoluta e Indiscutibile. Come giò ho sostenuto altrove, non si tratta di di una faccenda storica, risolvibile con i metodi della ricerca e della documentazione storica, ma di una vera e propria Religio che pretende una fede cieca e assoluta quale mai il cristianesimo e il cattolicesimo sono riusciti ad imporre. Si noti infine che il Tizio che commenta la notizia non sa per scienza propria, ma si riferisce ad un sapere che gli viene da altri e che evidentemente reputa indiscutibile. Mah!